hmmm very interesting! and i protested against his ban!! lol!! pretty awesome photo btw!

--
Somewhere far along this road
She lost her soul
To a man so heartless
How could you be so heartless?

w h a t ???

he got banned ???

I have no intelligent questions ...
no words ...

thanx for the advertisement

I love it! I really like the mixture of a photograph and drawing.

--
My Prints PoisonAlice-stock Shelly Unveiled-work in progress

hey how do you know its because of his art that he was making fetish styuff and shit?why would it be considered as offensive ? its has rights just any other life style

--
KEEP ON KEEPING ON! and PLEASE BUY MY PRINTS [link]

I don't know it, because nobody from DA has explained the reasons yet. It is just a guess. I get the impression that DA only looks at the surface of his work, not at the *meaning*. How can anybody be pro-rape, pro-selfdestruction or pro-harrasement? His pictures are protests *against* those things! By banning TVDS, DA suddenly supports people commiting these things, at least according to my opinion.

--
^{All that matters is work.
(Andy Warhol)
my music | my work | my illustration-account}

i believe its less complicated than that, because there are many others on DA which do macabre and Horror, fetish etc art. and some deviants who have no clue about art post plain 100 amature porn on here. if DA would really care bout that theyd have to bann half if not more of the community
and so far that i ve seen his work it doesnt strike me as offencive and provocative he clearly digs fetish and builds his art on it thats all, nothing new have seen it all before, hes good at what he does

--
KEEP ON KEEPING ON! and PLEASE BUY MY PRINTS [link]

Well, he would not agree if you "degrade" him to a fetish-photographer. Again the fetish and gothic imagery is only the surface. Underneath that surface there is really often protest against things that are going wrong in our world. You should really take a look at his page. There you'll see better what I am referring to.

Then again it could be that you are right. But does that make my theory less likely? Or what is even worse, does that mean the DA admins are less ignorant to art? Quite the opposite I'd say. If one has not got the abillity to comprehend the message of a piece, no matter who the creator ist, and thus sees underneath the surface, is simply lacking the intelligence to actually understand *anything* about art.

--
^{All that matters is work.
(Andy Warhol)
my music | my work | my illustration-account}

i will take a closer look at his gallery you intrigued me
and i do agree with your point all in all its just that we shouldnt really expect much of intelligence in this community there is only a handfull of tallent here and most of it is underrated anyway

--
KEEP ON KEEPING ON! and PLEASE BUY MY PRINTS [link]

banned??? *stares dumbfounded*
TDSV has produced some of the most thought prevoking and ammusing work i have seen on DA

now off to add to the list of what i am guessing is quite a long list of protestors of this ban

--
I am everything.
I am nothing.
I am the paradox